
The microwaveable popcorn makers are now facing the public awareness of “popcorn lung” with its explosion onto the media scene. The health risk is caused by the diacetyl gas that pervades production plants and also emanates from microwavable packages once opened at home. Class action lawsuits abound (NY Times).
I posted about evading transparency last week. All that is not yet known will be known. Customers are engaged and questioning all. For brands like Orville Redenbacker (a ConAgra Foods brand) this does not bode well; ConAgra is now dealing with this on the heels of the salmonella peanut butter lawsuit. There is no press release or mention of this on their site; nor have I seen the CEO reach out to the public. What is going on in the offices of ConAgra?
Again, set a precedent, clean house and lead in ensuring consumer safety–the new cause. If you knowingly manufacture health risks, do not waste a moment; table this at the next management meeting with a course of action to follow.
If you don’t think inaction could kill your brand and corporation’s profits or sustainability here are a few troubled brands that have been dragged through mass media and the legal system recently as reminders:
- ConAgra: salmonella in Peter Pan peanut butter
- Menu Foods: melamine and rat poison in pet foods
- Vioxx/Merck: meds caused heart attacks
- Daimler Chrysler: faulty transmission
- Bausch and Lomb: Renu Multiplus because of iron
- Glaxo: Paxil suicides
Often practices are similar in one industry. When one maker transgresses, the entire category suffers. Jolly Time and all house brands are affected in this popcorn fiasco. But what’s more impressive is that with every new public announcement or lawsuit, consumers’ distrust increases.
Transparency is quickly become a staple brand promise. Can you place a “100% transparent” label to your brand? Put your brand to the test; you may be missing a meaningful value in your brand’s meaning. There is profit in transparency.
Here are many press and social media statements:
Baltimore Sun: “Millions of Americans are exposed regularly to vapors released when they heat products containing the same synthetic butter flavoring blamed for destroying the lungs of workers in popcorn and flavoring factories. But public health activists say no one in government has stepped up to assess whether consumers are at risk.
The Food and Drug Administration has jurisdiction over products people ingest but reports it has no plans to investigate. Critics say the agency’s response reflects a pattern of governmental indifference to the possible threat posed by breathing diacetyl, a butter flavoring agent.” Read the whole story here
The Non-Toxic Newsletter at Seventh Generation: “These reports pose a potentially troubling question: Are we nuking our lungs when we zap our popcorn? The short answer is that no one knows. The Food and Drug Administration is refusing to investigate, and the Occupational Safety and Health Administration has taken no action to set exposure limits for the chemical. (Although the Teamsters and other unions were concerned enough to petition Congress in July for immediate action.) Interestingly, the EPA has studied the issue of diacetyl releases from microwaved popcorn but so far the agency is withholding its data from consumers and sharing it only with flavoring manufacturers.”
Read the whole story here
Washington Post:
“Even less is known about the health effects of eating diacetyl in butter-flavored popcorn, or breathing the fumes after the bag is microwaved. The Environmental Protection Agency has studied the fumes but is waiting for the industry to review the study before releasing it. The Food and Drug Administration has diacetyl on its list of substances “generally recognized as safe” but has not studied it.”
St.Louis Post Dispatch:
“All rats exposed to diacetyl rapidly showed signs of distress. Those exposed to medium and high levels died within seven days, according to the industry data. Of the 10 rats with highest exposure, nine died the first day.”